atans1

PM’s speech: Not juz a change of format

In Political economy, Political governance on 31/08/2012 at 6:32 am

(Or “Why LKY would not have made this speech” or “Two cheers for PM”)

It’s been five days since the speech and the air is thick with analyses and commentaries of what PM said last Sunday. Most of them are noise or smoke or hot air.

While the constructive, nation-building media gushed (like a teen-ager about her puppy love) over the PM’s speech, netizens were not too impressed. Typical reactions:

PM Lee, to no one’s surprise, did not address the root cause of the many issues troubling Singaporeans. The lack of accountability and transparency, civic and political freedoms, freedom of the media, human rights failings, gerrymandering and discriminatory upgrading projects have their roots in repression.

How can there be hope, heart and home when the real issues – foreigner, infrastructure, housing, transport and healthcare – are still outstanding?

Come on netizens: Look on the bright side. He

– Pledged to ensure sufficient affordable housing for citizens, and built more nursing homes for the elderly.

– Said the government will decide on measures to encourage Singaporeans to marry and have more children after consulting the public. Areas being considered include better work- life balance, flexible work arrangements, priority housing for couples with young kids, paternity or shared maternity leave, defraying childhood medical expenses, better pre-school, childcare and infant care, and improving cash benefits for having children known as baby bonuses, he said.

– Pledged Singapore will have two more universities to increase educational opportunities and the government will invest S$60 billion over ten years on the island’s subway system. Bloomberg report.

What this means is that the government is finally going to spend our money on us. No more of his dad’s “frugality”* on spending S’poreans money on S’poreans.

He is saying, “It’s yr money, let’s spend it on making you happier”.

To reinforce the point, he implicitly promised that there would be no near time tax rises, saying (correctly) that Singapore will need to raise taxes in the next two decades (but not now) as the government boosts social spending to support an aging population.

In the past ministers like Tharman and Raymond Lim (remember him?) threatened to raise GST whenever S’poreans asked for more govt spending.

So netizens, give the PM more rope to hang himself or show us that things are a’changing. The assumptions and prejudices of the PAP remain (see here) but at least he is spending our money on things that we want or need to make life more comfortable.

For that let’s give him two cheers. Give him a third if he rethinks the aforesaid prejudices and assumptions inherited from dad.

*An economist lecturing at SMU once commented (when LKY was MM and in rude health) that LKY would die if the government spent a cent more than absolutely necessary on making life more comfortable for S’poreans. Having read his daughter’s comments on his wanting Mrs Lee to change the elastic band on his underwear when she was recovering from her stroke, I think the economist had a valid point, and wasn’t joking.

About these ads
  1. I hope PAP would change and start praising Singaporeans instead of criticising them .
    The reason is simple,where else in this world can you can find such a generous people & over generous country who accept people from all the continents(The exception may be Antarctica but what the hell?) regardless of race,language and religion.
    I am confident that our people will response positively if PAP starts changing its of old tune of Singaporeans being xenophobic or becoming one.
    Now over the Ministers in charge of National Conversation.

  2. [...] Thoughts of a Cynical Investor: PM’s speech: Not juz a change of format – guanyinmiao’s musings: Teach Less Learn More In Singapore: Reforming Examinations? [...]

  3. Please don’t mention the names of the likes of LKY and Tharman in vain. It is the pityable depth of ingratitude. These leaders were visionaries who created from virtual nothing a thriving metropolis called Singapore.
    Which other country in the whole world has such a record of 47 short years of continual raising of standards of living of the common people? Among these common people, some have raised their own bar. This is a phenomenon which requires altruistic joy of muditha as taught by the Buddha. Some have either not tried or were indeed born not having the energy to thrive. Neither can be labelled as the responsibility of the government. Governments and individuals alike can and indeed must do their best within capacity to support those people not thriving among us. This is kindness.
    There is no place for cynicism in today’s Singapore.

  4. I am wary of doublespeak especially on ‘affordability’ from their perspective.
    All our present problems have their roots in his immigration policy. Stem the flow of PRs and new citizens and our situation will be ameliorated immediately; then we can pumped up the infrastructure to cater to the increased population to resolve the angst – but he won’t shut the gate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 211 other followers

%d bloggers like this: