Try telling the PA and yr minister abt unity, PM?

In Political governance on 06/09/2011 at 7:18 am

On 1 September 2011, the PM said Singapore must also build a united society which leaves no Singaporean behind. He was speaking at the swearing-in ceremony of Singapore’s seventh President Dr Tony Tan at the Istana.

This was the fifth time that he had spoken about the need for unity since the 7th May 2011 General Election. Five times in five months.

Well the trouble with this latest attempt was that the day before, the People’s Association (a statutory of agency of which he is chairman) had published a statement explaining why it excluded Opposition MPS from being appointed grassroot leaders. In a letter to the Straits Times Forum, PA director of corporate and marketing communications Ooi Hui Mei said on behalf of the CEO, “Besides connecting people to people, grassroots advisers are required to help the Government connect with people and help promote Government policies and programmes such as anti-dengue and active ageing. Hence, the Government has to appoint grassroots advisers who support its programmes and can play this role well. Opposition MPs cannot be expected to do this and thus cannot become advisers to GROs.”

She is saying that Opposition MPs are not loyal S’poreans that the government and PA can trust.

Ms Ooi’s letter drew a response from WP’s Aljunied GRC MP Pritam Singh (the guy with tots of being in coalition with the PAP on his brain). He wrote on his Facebook page that he found it “apposite to inform the PA that Opposition MPs do not love the aedes mosquito, nor do we have anything against active aging.” He cited examples of former and current PAP MPs, including former MP Tan Cheng Bock and President Tony Tan, who opposed the Nominated MP scheme and the graduate mother’s scheme respectively.

Hehehe. Snigger, snigger. Gd riposte Bei-Yee Singh. Letter writers to ST and Today and online forums joined in the fun of bashing Ms Ooi’s letter.

Unhappy with this mauling, the deputy chairman of the PA, Lim Swee Say (who is also a cabinet minister and NTUC chief), not heeding PM’s call for unity, got Ms Ooi to issue another letter on 3 September 2011, making the same point again: that Opposition MPs are not loyal S’poreans that the government and PA can trust.

Because of her letters, I’m again left wondering (I’ve commented on his four previous attempts here) whether the PM is sincere when he calls for unity. Why should I take his words at face value, when the spokeswoman from a government agency, where he is the chairman, takes a view that is contrary to his call for unity, both before and after his message. If she had not written the second letter, I would have been willing to try to suspend cynical disbelief. But Ms Ooi’s letters have left me no choice but to disbelieve the PM.

Is he or the CEO and deputy chairman, she scribed for, off-message? Or is his definition of “unity” different? Maybe he means “unity under the regime of Hard Truths”?

Time will tell.

If PM is sincere abt unity, what abt talking a leaf from Mao. When the Chinese Communist Party refused to listen to him, he launched the Culture Revolution. Maybe PM should reform the PA to better serve his and our needs.

  1. […] Jee Say can best serve the nation by starting a new party each – Thoughts of a Cynical Investor: Try telling the PA and yr minister abt unity, PM? – TOC: Dissolve PA in Interest of National Unity – TOC: PAP: From ‘divide and conquer’ to the […]

  2. Talk and no action is a waste of breath, the whole nation is aware of the doings of the PA by imposing conditions on leasing of open space, land which belong’s to the STATE. If you call this kind of atitude by PA, UNITY, go tell this to the ghosts.
    What the people in this country is aware of, is there is a divide, definately, between the people in political parties, the people between elite and the poor, imported and natural citizens, even between FOUR ONLY does everyone believe that they are really UNITED.

  3. Ruling partyr is sincere about unity…on their terms!

  4. PAP should just disband PA and sack all the staff. Not only can preserve unity better but can also save some money. Critical functions can be consolidated and subsumed directly by MCYS.

  5. Is the PA not another branch of ‘fat-cat’ crony system spoonfed by PAP with the public taxpayers’ monies in the name of bringing Singaporeans together ?

    With an ever increasing national divide among the people, so is this not proof that the PA has indeed failed miserably in its national tasks of either connecting ‘people to people’ or ‘people to our PAP Govt’ ?

    So Ms. Ooi, what else do you have to say on behalf of your CEO ? And why is it that your CEO is not brave enough to come out and say it in public himself and hide behind your skirt, for that matter ?

  6. The PM is serious about unity.
    He wants the people to be united behind the government to allow the PAP’s continued use of PA as a people’s funded accessory of the PAP. So let us stay united or at least continue giving them the majority vote, shall we?

  7. Obviously the PM like the HOD in a Corp is projecting to the staff below the goody shoe guy while using the secretary to do all the nasty bitching.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: