Supporters in the limelight, boon or bane for the NSP?

In Political governance on 01/12/2011 at 6:54 pm

Until the 16th of November, the NSP (Nicole Seah excepted, and she has been keeping a low profile for sometime) had a very low Internet profile. Things have changed because three persons openly associated with the NSP have played leading roles in two of the three “sedition” complaints (three in the space of five days) made to the police asking the police to investigate whether “sedition” had been committed. All three complaints have been well publicised and commented on on the Internet (including Facebook) with most “voices” “hammering” Neo, the Young PAP and the PAP, and Donaldson.

That the three leading complainants in the drama were NSP supporters, and that NSP released a statement* on one of the three incidents were also well publicised. But there was very little comment on their association with the NSP, none of which was negative of the NSP.

This posting is about whether the public’s views of the NSP could change even though it is clear that no-one reasonably thinks that these actions were sanctioned, approved or pre-planned by the leadership of the NSP or its Malay Section.

Noor Firdaus (the exposer of Jason Neo) is, according to a Yahoo! report, “a volunteer with opposition National Solidarity Party (NSP)”. Note that on Facebook there is a “Firdaus Venezio (Noor Firdaus Abdul Samad)” who says his political views are aligned with those of those of the NSP.

But the circumstances surrounding the exposing of Neo were strange.Neo’s Facebook’s “friends” had pointed out in March 2011 that he was wrong . He had then explained that it was not meant to be taken seriously, and had apologised. That he should have removed the picture is beyond doubt. But as none of his “friends” had thought it necessary to advise, suggest or demand that he remove the post, I suspect, he thought he had done enough to “purge” himself of his mistake.

When Firdaus saw the image sometime in November, and complained to Neo, Neo apologised again and took down the image. It could have ended there.

But Firdaus made copies of the image and spread it on the Internet: after the original had disappeared. He sent it to various PAP MPS (Neo was a member of the Young PAP), TOC and NSP member Abdul Salim. Abdul Salim was quoted by TOC as saying: “I have just make a Police report against Jason Neo Tiong Yap. Was updated by the officers on duty that the Principal of HUDA Kindergarten has also lodge a report early in the afternoon.”

Then one Amran Junid was unhappy with a Facebook post of one Donaldson Tan. He made a police report, and told TOC about it. TOC, in turn, wrote a story on the matter. According to the New Asia Republic (which Donaldson Tan founded and where he is an editor), “Checks on Amran’s background have shown that he is closely linked with an opposition party, the National Solidarity Party …”.

I never did think these actions were sanctioned, approved or pre-planned by the leadership of the NSP or its Malay Section, but were the individuals’ initiative.

A cynic could reasonably conclude that, given their association with the NSP, Firdaus and Abdul Salim could be trying to score political points by damaging the reputations of the Young PAP, PAP and the government. And raising their party’s profile to boot. Politics is a dirty game. Other more personal motivations could have be dreamt up by a cynic too.

But netizens know that NSP supporters were prime actors in these actions.

Whether the publicity is beneficial, or not, for the NSP has yet to be seen. For a party often perceived to be Chinese-based, the high Internet profile of three non-Chinese NSP activists could change perceptions of the party, and attract more non-Chinese supporters. The party has Malay and Indian Bureaus to focus on the specific needs and concerns of S’porean Malays and Indians.

But it does seem strange that people associated with a party that Firdaus calls “Libertarians” resort to “flaming” or making police reports because their feelings were hurt. These supporters do not seem to be aligned with libertarian principles, as I understand them to be. Worse for the NSP, their actions could be seen by many voters as irresponsible, disproportionate, reckless and possibly causing more harm than the original misdeeds they were trying to highlight.

All of which goes to show the wisdom of the WP in being very careful and cautious in accepting new members and “volunteers’.

As Nicile Seah is in PR and is the people’s poster gal of what a young activist is all about, she could lead NSP’s efforts to make sure that its members and supporters are “on message” and that other S’poreans get the “right” impression of the NSP?

Let me be clear, I

  • don’t condone what Neo and Donaldson did;
  • say they were wrong and irresponsible to do what they did;
  • think the actions of Abdul Salim and Amran Junid were not an appropriate response to the original misdeeds;
  • say Firdaus was irresponsible and reckless, and his actions were not an appropriate response to Neo’s misdeed; and
  • have no issues with TOC covering the stories, or the way TOC handled them. News is news.

And, for the record, I know and like the core team members of TOC; and I help out occasionally in subbing, and non-editorial matters.

 Finally, I have more reflections on this issue, which I plan to blog next week. Still reflecting.


*I, and others, were wondering why NSP issued the statement until it became clear that Firdaus was an NSP supporter. 

  1. Hmm… If the accusers were from YPAP and the accused were from NSP, there would have been more severe reactions (punishments) from the powers that be. So give NSP some slacks here! The party was not even involved in this matter.

  2. NSP is playing racial politics. I am quite disturbed by its developments.

  3. One more comment –

    Does the current law on sedition allow someone to get away by issuing an apology after committing the crime? I don’t think so. So you have the answer. The law is there because it is a serious matter and has the potential to incite hatred and violence.

    Individual NSP member actions do not imply party positions. Just as YPAP members’ indiscretions do not reflect party positions.

  4. […] Vote for Change – Thoughts of a Cynical Investor: Supporters in the limelight, boon or bane for the NSP? – A Singaporean In Australia: Short Tales, Singapore Style [Thanks Weili] – TOC: Police denies SFD […]

  5. Please Lah…… Editor is a CRAP fellow…He is out of his mind..Those idiot who had purposely touch on sensitive button of religion and races should face the full brunch of the LAW. Be it anyone a road sweeper, toilet cleaner or party member oppsition or Goverment of the Day should face it. Why are you palying it over and over again. If the opposition catch 3 thieves in a day does that make him guilty as the thieves. STUPID EDITOR please go drink more milk and grow up.

  6. Nicole Seah is in a media agency, not PR. World of difference there.

  7. Firdaus is insane. I used to be the same camp with him. He’s a gay and love guys. Live to stir shit and make the whole company suffer. He been wanting to be apart of PAP during his ns days but sadly I think PAP did the right thing for not enrollibg him. He has many motives and a famous back stabber.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: