Cynical take on infrastructure spending

In Uncategorized on 30/07/2012 at 5:14 am

(Or “Planning to open the floodgates again after the next GE?”)

“The government plans to ramp up infrastructure in Singapore over the next decade to meet the needs of population growth here in recent years, even though the inflow of immigrants has fallen since 2009,” spun the constructive, nation-building BT (a sister publication of STOMP where paid “content providers” posed as citizen journalists and faked at least one item of news).

It went on, “Population growth in recent years has outpaced infrastructure capacity, a paper released by the government yesterday noted. Published by the National Population and Talent Division (NPTD), the paper notes the need to build infrastructure in a timely manner. A major effort over the next 5-10 years will seek to meet the demand for housing, transport and public services.” More details below*.

One wonders if all this spending has two purposes:

One we all know: improve the governing PAP’s image with the voters so that in the next general election (it has to be held by 2016, but can be earlier), the PAP can improve on its 60% share of the vote, and perhaps even win back Aljunied GRC?

And if the winning majority is back up to the high 60s, open the doors again to FTs by the cattle truck-loads?

If you think I’m being too sceptical or cynical about the government’s intentions, this is what the May issue of the ISEAS Monitor says abt an earlier report** in April this year by said government unit, “[it] serves as an early warning of a possible relaxation of recently tightened immigration policies.” ISEAS is the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies , a think-tank that is a statutory board that needs government financing.

Note that it also said that the White Paper on population promised by the end of the year, will be based on said report made public in April.

And in ST (also sister of STOMP) on the same day that  BT’s report, it was reported that the government is asking our views on population: FTs and birth rates included)

Still think I’m too sceptical?

Watch and wait. And think thrice about voting for the PAP even if the PAP makes sure the public transport system improves by a factor of 10, new public housing becomes affordable, and the needy get lots more help.


*The rail network will be doubled in Singapore, from 138km in 2008 to 280km in the next 10 years. One new segment of the MRT network will open every year to from now to 2017. This will ensure that more than 400,000 housing units on the island will be within 400 metres of a rapid transit system station, more than double that today.

More than 800 new buses will be rolled out over the next five years, which will raise the current bus capacity by 20 per cent. Some $4.7 billion has been allocated in fiscal year 2012 to enhance the public transport infrastructure in Singapore. In all, the government has committed to spend about $60 billion to double the Singapore MRT network from what it was in 2008, and to increase the capacity of existing rail lines, the expenditure overview stated.

**It warned of the low fertitilty rate and the need for 20-25,000 new FT citizens a year to keep the population from declining in 2030.


  1. PAP would be sad if it knows it has little probability to achieve this ambition.

  2. Yes, you have it pretty much right. PAP can always fall back to using the reserve to buy good will (or votes?) from the electorate. That will keep them going for a few more elections. Unless something drastic happens, e.g. they blow the reserve, prices get out of control, or they become totally inept, PAP will be dominant for quite a while. Yes, today’s PAP, including its PM, is pretty inept but it is not bad enough to send them packing.

  3. The new infrastructures are not added for the sake of native singaporeans. There’re to be build for the foreigners & new citizens that PAP had taken in & planning to bring in.

    Before GE2011, it seemed to have never occurred to PAP that there is a huge deficit in demand & suppy all across the island.
    If PAP gets the 60+% in GE2011, it’s not hard to imagine how much worse the situation that native singaporeans will have to endure now.

    PAP is definitely into its vote-buying act & activities since. And PAP is just bidding its time before releasing more traitorous policies once if they fortunately, unfortunately for singaporeans, somehow obtained the 60+% of the votes in the next GE.

    If this freak result really happened, it may very well finally breaks the camel’s back.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: