Olam is not listed in US and subject to SEC scrutiny.
“Muddy Waters Secret China Weapon Is on SEC Website”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-19/muddy-waters-secret-china-weapon-is-on-sec-website.html
The success of Muddy waters in destroying Sino-Forest (also not listed in US) made it guilty of hubris?
Xmen and others Temasek-haters: Ang moh not always tua kee if they bet, bitch against Temasek. They may juz be plain wrong, like Muddy Waters and Balding.
All citizens of Singapore are stake-holders of Temasek,so I do not think any of them qualify as Temasek -haters, unhappy stakeholders,yes,I am one,but not hater,why?bacause I like money more than I dislike PAP,so it is a matter of track record,nothing else.I am not sure that Muddy Waters and Balding are both wrong,but I respect your opinion.
Tight-lipped transactions: Degrees of transparency in sovereign wealth funds
Political economist Assoc Prof Christopher Balding examines the rapid rise of sovereign wealth funds in global finance, and focuses on issues of transparency and governance. He also discusses the impact that such large sums of money have on domestic and international politics. Presented by Eric van Bemmel.
http://upclose.unimelb.edu.au/episode/235-tight-lipped-transactions-degrees-transparency-sovereign-wealth-funds
We are all none the wiser as long as they can hide behind the high wall that is Singapore Inc.
Which side of the wall are you on?
In Sino-Forest case, the Ontario Securities Commission followed the lead of the Muddy Waters, while in all other Muddy Waters’ successful cases, MW followed the lead of the SEC. The OSC is a joke.