atans1

Noble CEO gets it, ministers don’t?/ Noble a Buy?

In Accounting, Political governance on 20/03/2015 at 12:12 pm

“We unfortunately live in world where knowing that you run your business professionally is not enough,” the CEO of Noble wrote in a letter to stakeholders in February. “You must be able to prove it.”

But will he walk the talk? Two big funds* think so and have been buying. Maybe they have been assured on the following?

[A] chunk of the profits Noble reports comes from non-cash gains created by “marking to market” long-term contracts (eg, to supply coal) and derivatives it holds. Iceberg is not accusing Noble of fraud, but it is questioning how realistic these valuations are and asking how much of the company’s reported profits are the result of this practice. Noble reported that at the end of 2014 the net fair value of these positions was $4.6 billion, equivalent to 91% of its book value.

It is hard to tell from what Noble discloses in its accounts whether its valuations are indeed fair; and since it is also unclear how much of its profits come from such changes in valuation, it is difficult to assess how robust its profits are. Noble did not respond to requests from The Economist for comment. The firm’s cashflow has been weak. Over the past three years it has booked net profits of almost $1 billion but negative cashflow of almost $2 billion, after working-capital, capital-investment and interest costs.

On March 5th it issued an 11-page rebuttal, suggesting that a disgruntled ex-employee was behind Iceberg. It also gave more detail about the “fair value” positions. They reflect over 12,000 individual contracts, almost half of which mature within two years. Over the past three years the firm has realised $800m of cash from such positions. Yet the rebuttal omitted a vital piece of information: how much profit has been booked from these positions. Without this nugget it is hard to form a sensible judgment about Noble’s books or health.

Emphasis mine

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21646233-big-asian-commodity-trader-attacked-anonymous-online-critic-nobbled

*A unit of insurer Prudential, and Invesco increased their stakes in the company. [Added at 1.40pm]

Advertisements
  1. Of the 3 traditional statements, the statement of cashflows is the most important & hardest to manipulate with creative accounting. And this is where noble has been failing big time.
    When the US gives permission for crude exports, companies like noble will collapse. As it is, Russia is developing more pipelines and establishing tanker routes to china, japan, korea for its oil & gas, which is eating up noble’s biz.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: