atans1

Americans subtle, PRC leaders cock (cont’d)

In China on 19/07/2016 at 6:46 am

Here I pointed out that China is really dumb … Why did it sign UNCLOS in the first place if it thinks it’s a tua kee like the US?

The US refuses to sign UNCLOS because it refuses to play by the rules of sua kes like the UN and PinoyLand. It reserves the right to do what it thinks is right (Usually this means “Might is right”).

But China did sign up and now refuses to abide by a decision of its highest tribunal. Why so stupid?

Actually the US is even smarter than I tot. Successive US administrations have said that they will abide by UNCLOS despite the US not being a party to it. At the same time, because the US is not bound by it, it can legally, in International law, ignore any ruling it doesn’t like. And unlike China, it is not an outlaw.

How did the US this “Heads I win, tails you lose,” situation?

UNCLOS needs to be ratified by the US Senate for it to be binding on the US.  Treaty ratification requires 2/3 of the senate to vote for approval, and there are more than sufficient senators happy to block ratification because they say UNCLOS violates US hegemony (OK “sovereignty”).

Those who read James Clavell’s Asian Saga novels will know that the Chinese characters were always sneering that the ang mohs were stupid fools to be manipulated despite them lording over the Chinese because they, unlike, the Chinese had the technology to defeat the Chinese in battle, and were not afraid of using violence. Well I’m sure these Chinese characters will be ashamed that the PRC leaders got tricked by the ang mohs.

Btw, the Japanese characters were also sneering at the ang mohs. But the ang mohs have not outsmart them except in making the Japanese buy  in the 1980s US assets at inflated prices; assets bot back a few years later at fire-sale prices.

And looking at the Chinese buying of US assets, one wonders if the Chinese are the victims of another US scam.

.

 

Advertisements
  1. Why give away naval supremacy by signing a piece of paper like the British did in the 1920s?

    • UK had no choice then. No money. Americans were nit willing to lend UK money. Today China happy to lend US money to build carriers to threaten the rise of China. )))

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: