atans1

What alt media doesn’t tell about OECD social mobility study

In Media on 28/11/2018 at 1:16 pm

There was a lot of KPKBing by anti-PAP types (sane and nutty) about the major international study on social mobility from the OECD economics think tank: Meritocracy here? What meritocracy?

the report also identified gaps in areas such as how well students from lower socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds do compared to the top scorers in the nation.

FEWER LOW SES STUDENTS OBTAIN SCORES EQUIVALENT TO TOP PERFORMERS

However, not many were performing to standards attained by the top quarter in Science, a measure the report categorised as national resilience.

It was found that among 15-year-old students from lower-SES backgrounds, only 10 per cent were able to attain a score of at least 631 in the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) for science in 2015.

For the Republic, a score of 631 is the 75th percentile score for science.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/singapore-ranks-third-educational-mobility-gaps-remain-report

Alt media and the cybernuts went into overdrive on this report from the supposedly constructive, nation-building media.

But the constructive, nation-building media also reported

Singapore’s Education Ministry (MOE) said that the “relatively low” national resilience is “a function” of the fact that Singapore’s top performers do very well.

(Btw, any idea what this means?)

More importantly, here’s what Schleicher head of education at the OECD said

In countries such as Singapore, Japan and Finland, the test results of the poorest 20% are higher than the richest 20% in the Slovak Republic, Uruguay, Brazil and Bulgaria.

He says it’s a cause for optimism that some countries have made sure that “excellent teaching” is available for rich and poor pupils.

And then there’s this from him

In Singapore, many going to university will be the first in their families to get a degree. It’s an example of social mobility and widening doors.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46013665

So why didn’t alt media report this? Is it because alt media and other anti-PAP opinionators only read ST and other local media publications and pick stuff that shows what the PAP govt is doing wrong? Some only read the freebies like Goh Meng Seng. Once he KPKBed about the lying local media. When it was pointed out that ST had reported what he complained the MSM did not report, he said he only read the free stuff.

With enemies like him, no wonder the PAP knows it will win the next GE.

Advertisements
  1. Resilience means the ability of a person to positively adapt to adverse circumstances. Social and psychology research have established that people in low SES have both poor physical and psychological outcomes. Greater social mobility is generally associated with greater resilience. Do note the resilience and social mobility connection are relative. So what the MOE is saying can also be read as our low SES cohorts have low resilience given that those who benefitted from social mobility have benefitted disproportionately and have pulled far ahead. This is also a reflection of income and wealth inequality which are 2 different things. There are anecdote of low resilience already if you read deeper into the responses from the line troops to the SMRT and Singhealth fark-ups.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: