atans1

Why sink a M’sian vessel

In Malaysia on 12/12/2018 at 11:26 am

This blog advocates ramming and sinking a M’sian vessel that intrudes into our waters especially the one that is parked in our waters: Let’s gloat at Tun as he threatens us

It’s to show the Chief Mat that we will not tolerate anymore his provocations. Before LKY moved on, we were fair-minded and mature enough to accept that Tun had a point in his provocations. He and Harry were always playing mind games with one another, and we just had to bear and grin given Harry’s demigod status here. Or perhaps 9th immortal status (see below)?

But Harry’s gone. But Tun still continues behaving like a damaged DVD, playing the same tune and images, over and over again. It’s very irritating.

Now’s a great time to show  the Chief Mat who’s tua kee.

This chart from FT shows that ang mohs own a lot of M’sian M$ debt. They’ll run for the hills if we ram and sink a M’sian vessel, then run further when M’sia threatens war, and even further when it backs down because even the M’sian govt admits that its military is not fit for purpose. Here’s something that a M’ian says about the sorry state of it’s armed forces: https://cilisos.my/actually-how-prepared-is-malaysia-if-a-war-broke-out/?fbclid=IwAR3nuIgtcLwc5x6qvyCKydlTbdkx_BkOFcQnB7_OyZPjyGX-VoDWCv6v-E4

Remember he has problems largely of the financial kind and foreigners not buying M’sian debt is a very serious problem

Let’s gloat at Tun as he threatens us

Malay Malaysian academic says Tun trying to distract attention from govt failings

Btw, I hope soon to blog on a constructive, nation-building and less violent way of squeezing Tun’s balls, making Tun cry  “Uncle”, given that our PM and his cabinet (full of ex-generals) doesn’t do shock and awe, giving the lie to the comments by P(olitician) Ravi.

The trouble with having so many Generals in the Cabinet, is that it may choose a more aggressive approach in solving a crisis over choosing a more diplomatic solution.

Yes, time to stand united against threats to sovereignty, but cooler heads should prevail.

How we deal with Malaysia over the encroachment issue, should be no different from how we dealt with the Chinese when they seized our infantry fighting vehicles.

I hope Mr Chiam told off Ravi for this FB post. Ravi was playing politics with the above comments: he should not have done so. At the time, he made the above comments, nothing any cabinet minister did or said, suggested that violence against the M’sian vessels was being even considered as an option.

Coming back to the 9th immortal

 

  1. Don’t mean to alarm you but do consider Malaysia don’t need a military response if it comes to that. Juz cut off the water supply.

  2. back in ’98, m’sian govt also threatened repeatedly over a few weeks to do what c kuan commented above.

  3. Cutting off water supply is as good as a preemptive military strike on S’pore i.e. S’pore will likely strike without much clarification with the M’sian side. Will likely see mass open mobilisation within 24 hrs. Those of us who did NS in the 80s & earlier will recall the many times exercises both in the field & table top where the scenario is “forward defense” or basically invasion & control of certain JB areas. There’s a good reason why we have so many LSTs & why we practice so much for beach invasions & seaborne attacks. 😉 With today’s hardware, S’pore will likely follow US style — predawn attacks by airforce & SF from 2-3am onwards to capitalise on SAF night vision superiority, intense electronic jamming & counter elec warfare, followed by saturation artillery & rocket bombardments and follow on by armor & mechanized troops by dawn and/or seaborne invasions on JB coastline. S’pore will count on having localised air superiority & airborne radar and drone recon. Plenty of deaths on both sides though.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.