atans1

igNoble Hse omnishambles puts spotlight two int’l accounting firms

In Accounting, China, Commodities, Corporate governance, Emerging markets on 29/12/2018 at 4:03 am

In the coming yr, investors, creditors and S’porean regulators of Noble will be singing

Fee-fi-fo-fum,
I smell the blood of an accountant from Ernst & Young or PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Be he alive, or be he dead
I’ll grind his bones to make my bread.

The back story

Noble Group is facing insolvency after authorities in Singapore said the crisis-hit commodity trader would not be able to list shares in a new entity, dealing a potentially fatal blow to its emergency debt restructuring.

Singapore’s white collar crime agency, its de facto central bank and the regulatory arm of the country’s stock exchange said they had “significant uncertainties about the financial position of ‘New Noble’”.

In a statement they said “New Noble’s” net asset value could be as much as 45 per cent lower than stated by the company when local standards stipulated by Singapore’s Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority were applied.

“It would be imprudent to allow the re-listing as investors will not be able to trade in New Noble’s shares on an informed basis. Monetary Authority of Singapore and Singapore Exchange will therefore not allow the re-listing of New Noble to proceed.”

FT a few weeks ago

The auditors were and are the Hong Kong arm of Ernst & Young

But they are not the only ones facing questions.

Noble Group’s Chief Executive Yusuf Alireza sought to draw a line under a long-running accounting dispute after a report by board-appointed auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) found no wrongdoing in the company’s accounting practices.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-noble-group-accounts/pwc-says-noble-groups-accounting-practices-comply-with-rules-idUSKCN0QF0Y420150810

 

  1. isn’t this shutting the doors of the barn after the horses have bolted? Pathetic.

    • Back story is even worse for the regulators. They only acted after a piece in FT in Sept 2018 castigating them and pointing out that complaints had been made but not acted on. LOL.

  2. Would Olam be in same company if not bailed out by Temasek? LOL! There’s no smoke without fire, and short sellers like Muddy Waters and Iceberg Research know their stuff, regardless what one thinks about opportunistic shortists. The more important question for Singapore is how much taxpayers’ monies it took to provide the backstop, and how much money we made if any?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: