Yesterday, in Putin learning from the PAP?, I wrote that the author of A History of the PAP 1985-2021 said,
the book is both a narrative and analysis of the PAP. It certainly is a narrative with the added bonus that because the PAP was in power during that period the book is also a narrative of S’pore’s economy and govt policies.
But when it comes to analysis, I’m reminded of Animal Farm and in particular what Boxer said
‘If Comrade Napoleon says it, it must be right. ‘ And from then on he adopted the maxim ‘Napoleon is always right’ …
He interviewed all the PAP tua kees and many ikan bilis, but from his coverage and analysis from 1985 till the immediate aftermath of GE2005, I did not learn anything new.
It wasn’t that this was a quiet period
The issues that the PAP faced were many: who was to succeed LKY, how the choice was to be made, why GCT chose Lee Jnr as his deputy and dauphin, ministerial salaries, GRCs, the Jade House row, the elected presidency and the locking up of the reserves, the presidential election, the row with Ong Teng Cheong, the handover to LHL and the 2005 GE.
On all these topics the book revealed nothing that I already knew or had surmised. At best I learnt about whiter shades of white or darker shades of white.
As I digest more of the book, I’ll blog my tots.